requestId:68499aae7766b8.34893049.
Whether to read books is the truth” or “it’s just the truth”?
——The Controversy and Dilemma of the Qing Confucian Confucians on the Establishment of “Ancient Literature and Books”
Author: Zhang Xun (Sichuan Major Historical Civilization Institute)
Source: “Qing History Research” Issue 3, 2015
Time: Confucius was in the 2568th year of Dingyou June 14th, Yiwei
Jesus July 7, 2017
The Qing Confucians’ arguments about “Ancient Literature and Books” are divided into two topics that are in contact with each other, one is “true shame” and the other is “destined”. Modern researchers stand at the stage of “literature” or “historical” and those who need to care only touch on “true” problems. But for Confucians in the Qing Dynasty, “true shame” himself did not fail to fully determine the value of “Ancient Literature Shangshu” in the Confucian system, because this consideration involves a layer of rational problems.
The Qing Confucians believed that although the ancient texts were pure and beautiful, they should consider how to consider the two choices between “sickness” and “rightness”, which became a difficult issue for their long-term disputes. The foundation of “Ideology” has faded from the concern of modern science. However, in this way, if we can slowly revise the retrospective logic of modern “historical” or “literary science” and deeply translate the dilemma of “inheritance” of Qing Confucians about “inheritance” due to “inheritance”, then the historical meaning of the Qing Dynasty Han (study) reflected by this debate on “Book” may no longer be its source of modern science, but rather its modern science and technology. href=”https://sites.google.com/view/sugardaddy-coding/”>Finish one month’s priceThe grandeur between them was broken.
—, Introduction
“Shangshu” is a classic book that has been taught by teachers and received the most complicated and ups and downs. Among the problems surrounding “Shangshu”, the truth about “Shangshushu” by Mei Jue of Dongyan and the attached “Shangshu” of Kong Anguo is the most famous case. Since the beginning of the Tang Dynasty, some people have suspected that “Australia” is not very reliable. In the Song, Yuan and Ming dynasties, there are many people who doubt “Australia” in the Song, Yuan and Ming dynasties, and there have been more and more serious struggles. As far as promoting the suspicious concept of “Architecture” is spread in the reading level, the most influential person in the past few hundred years is Zhu Xi of the Southern Song Dynasty. Zhu Xi’s doubts about the words of “Ancient Literature” are scattered in his “Collected Works” and “Texts”. In terms of nature, he is important to compare the words and sentences of “Ancient Literature” from the perspective of “verbs” and the words and sentences of “Ancient Literature” are compared to the true feelings of “Ancient Literature”. For example, “The Classic of Language” says: “Shang Shu” produced by Kong Bi, such as “Yu Zu”, “The Song of the Five Sons”, “Yinzheng”, “Tai Swo”, “Wucheng”, “The Fate of Weizi”, “Cai Zhong’s Fate”, “Junya”, etc., are all simple, and all the articles written by Fu Sheng are difficult to read. How can Fusheng remember the difficulty of the bottom line, but as for the easy foundation, all the things cannot be remembered? This cannot be done.
The suspicious chapters in “Book” may cause you to lose all your thoughts. …If Taoism is said to be the Yuanwen of the predecessors, how can those who come from Kong are more clear and easy to understand? It is difficult for those who come from Fusheng? Due to Zhu Xi’s special position, his doubts about the attitude and perspective of “Australia” have had a huge impact on the “Australia” who distinguished the “Australia” in the two dynasties since then. Therefore, “In a big way, from the Song Dynasty to the Ming Dynasty, people doubted ancient Chinese, but how easy it is to read ancient Chinese, and how difficult it is to read two sentences in modern Chinese, the scope is limited to the literary itself.” This situation has changed dramatically until the Ming and Qing Dynasties. change.
The lyrics and chapters are difficult and whether they are a question of benevolence and wisdom. Those who doubt “Australia” pointed out that the lyrics of “Australia” are too clear and smooth, and do not use pre-Qin characters; those who maintain “Australia” can also believe that “Ministry and Wen Shang Shu” may not necessarily be full of slight thighs every chapter, which is even similar to the ancient Chinese. Huang Zongxi’s “Epitaph of the Teacher Zhu Kangliu” says:
(Teacher Master) distinguishes the non-existence of “Ancient Literature Shangshu” and describes the books of Fusheng, such as “The Legend of the Condor Heroes”, “Gao Zuo”, “Hong Fan”, and “Wu Yi”, why is it not written in the words “Gan Swearing”, “Tang Swo”, “Mu Swo” and “The Destiny of Wenhou”, the words are clear and elegant, and the style is gentle and elegant. Among the twenty-five chapters, there is no way to distinguish them as modern texts as ancient texts.
Faced with Zhu’s argument, it is difficult to identify the “Ancient Literature” with only “letter” as the perspective. The early Qing Dynasty’s discernmentists already had a broad sense of this. Therefore, Huang Zongxi said: “If we distinguish between the differences and differences in literary system and make ancient texts, the collection is full of lines and no word and no origin. The current texts are also different from each other, and there is also a lack of folding their corners.” Cheng Tingzha’s answer to “Reply to the Dunfu””Questions to Shangshang Books” says:
The teacher’s words are not invisible, but they think they have not obtained the key points. Why? In the Book of Books, those who have not had any texts and words are smooth; those who are not interested in reading are often given meanings, but those who are easy to read are suddenly suddenly; those who are lost in the hidden place and exist in Confucius, how can you know that it is not a job? As for the Chinese characters in the wall, there is no slightest error, how can you know that ghosts and gods are good at guarding them to replenish the shortcomings? All of them can be said in the “Ancient Literature”. But what is not enough to be said in “Ancient Literature” is that it is unknown.
The text of Cheng’s briefly outlines the changes in the discerning perspective of “Architectural Arts”. Since the beginning of the Qing Dynasty, the “Ancient Literature” headed by Guan Ruoju has just reminded the “Ancient Literature” that “is unknown”, and searched one by one to point out the origin of the text of “Ancient Literature” as its skill, and proved that “Ancient Literature” was written. They transcended the perspective of “lexicon” since the Song Dynasty and introduced the identification task of “Ancient Literature” into the “examination” of historical materials.
The discerning essays in “Australia” have opened a new perspective of “examination” outside of “letter”, and the people who maintain “Australia” cannot be responsive. A passage from Li Jun’s “On Ancient Literature Book” explains themBaobao.comResponsible method:
Zhenggao Wenxiu said: “I read Mao Heyou’s “Ancient Literature and Book Definition” and thought it was from the Kong wall, from the government, and spread it among people. When I arrived at the secret palace of the Han Dynasty, I reported it to Kong Anguo’s “Chronichi”, and then listed it for national studies and examining historical records, and there was no way to be taught. But the ancient Chinese writing is as if it were a move, and it is as suspicious as the Song and Ming dynasties. Why? “I said, “I also doubt it. But Wan Jiye said, “I have said that when I read books, I don’t need to relate. If there is no Taoist ancient Chinese writing, the ancestors all said it in a partial way.” Gao Xu said, “Good.”
This shows that there are two types of their response methods. Mao Qi “examines the historical records” and vigorously proves that from Western Han to Dong Han, “BaohaowangThe ancient Chinese Books” is full of heritage, which is to atta
發佈留言